# FILE NAME: 00000734.soc
# TITLE: Should we ban smoking in cars with children? [f786320251169ce9a5e9ce423751507b]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 5
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - Smoking should be banned in cars with children. Children should be protected by law from being in cars with adults who are smoking.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - Smoking should be banned in cars with children. The dangers of passive smoking are well understood and children should not be exposed to these risks. Children should be protected by law to prevent them being in cars with adults who are smoking.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - YES, smoking in cars with children should be banned. The dangers of passive smoking are well understood and children should not be exposed to these risks. Children should be protected by law to prevent them being in cars with adults who are smoking.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - Children should not be exposed to the dangers of passive smoking and smoking in cars with children should be banned. This is an example of how a group of people with different views can come to a consensus after a good debate. The debate allowed people to express their views and to challenge the views of others. After a good debate, people often change their minds and are more willing to compromise. In the above example, the group of people came to a consensus that smoking in cars with children should be banned.
1: 2,1,3,4
1: 4,3,2,1
1: 4,1,2,3
1: 1,2,3,4
1: 4,2,3,1